Two problems with that: 1) The only geyser basin with sufficient communications infrastructure for web cams to even be feasible is the Upper Geyser Basin, and it's already got a couple that cover a large part of it in about the detail you could expect from what is effectively a single vantage point. They allow a usable but far from complete record. and 2) Try, just try, to get the local representatives of the National Park Service to let you finance, install and support a web cam somewhere. Offer perpetual technical and financial support, the backing of 20 major research institutions, and your first-born child. Good luck. David Schwarz On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:29 PM, greg mushial <gmushial at gmdr.com> wrote: > Again, as a noobie, but as someone that has had to deal with realworld > data taking: is it not possible to use a webcam to cover most of a geyser > field, sample the cam every 30 secs, 60 secs; and from experience or from > trianglating from a pair of cams, be able to identify what is erupting and > log the events? Clearly not as much fun as sitting and waiting and > watching... but might allow for the building of a more complete database, > and hence better eruption models. Just a thought... or what'll have to > pass as such. > dr greg > ______________________________**_________________ > Geysers mailing list > Geysers at lists.wallawalla.edu > https://lists.wallawalla.edu/**mailman/listinfo/geysers<> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20120724/f4134401/attachment.html>