[Geysers] Firehole Bear Management Area - in NPS press release
Seeyellowstone at aol.com
Seeyellowstone at aol.com
Fri Mar 13 06:51:39 PDT 2009
I still believe that I see way more bears in the Northern Range than I do in
the Firehole BMA, this is just my 40 years of life experience in the
Yellowstone area. By closing things, you are not teaching people how to live with
bears. I do believe there is enough volunteers out there, Id be willing to
bet that many of the geyser gazers would be willing to help monitor bear
activity.
In the Northern Range, the bear rangers and volunteers have taught the
public over the last few years about bear etiquette, and no we see many of the
wildlife watchers and wolf watchers policing themselves. It is much better to
educate the public on how to react to bear sightings than it is to have an
uneducated public. There is not enough bear rangers in the Northern Range,
however, every year people are getting a little better about policing themselves,
which means people get to see the bears from a safe distance. The park
drums up about 20 volunteers for the elk rut in Mammoth, I find it hard to
believe they can't find that number for the Old Faithful area in the couple of
weeks the bear activity is at it's greatest.
The bear numbers have exploded over the past ten years, likely because of
the additional food provided by wolves. As bear numbers continue to grow does
this mean we will have to close Yellowstone altogether?
I do not believe the park keeps track of very many den sites of the bears,
this would be an impossible task. as for the carcasses, yes last year there
was a carcass pile placed at the entrance of Firehole Lake Drive, which
attracted bears to the front country, a questionable move. Firehole Lake drive
could of been easily plowed or a better location would have been the Freight
Road for a mile in, which would have attracted the bears away from the road. As
of this date, and I have been at Fountain over 50 days this winter, there
are no carcasses anywhere near the boardwalk. Also, the more human activity in
an area, the less likely there will be bear activity in the area. Sure
bears may pass through from time to time, but it's Yellowstone National Park, it
happens.
I do not oppose the temporary closures of trails because there is a carcass
in the area, that is just common sense. But to close an area that has never
been closed in the park's history because a bear may pass through is
ridiculous. By closing these areas, encourages the bears to stick around longer.
This is just my 2 cents worth, being raised in the area. Are there any
other geyser gazers out there willing to volunteer at bear jams with a can of
bear spray, a vest and the willingness to educate the visitors about the bears
as well as the geysers? I bet we could come up with at least a dozen
volunteers.
Jim
YTG
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219850974x1201371016/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20090313/271dad43/attachment.html>
More information about the Geysers
mailing list