> It should be noted that there have been several different ways of measuring > Giant durations.> > The most objective method (I think) is the time from the first continuous > water to the last splash thrown out of the vent.> > Are some of the anomalously short eruptions (D << 90 minutes) due to different > ways of defining the eruption's end? I acknowledged the above problem in my earlier post. I do believe that there is some variance amongst observers in exactly when the eruption is said to be "over." I can remember various discussions about this last year as eruptions waned. Based on these experiences, I would be surprised if the difference was greater than 2-3 minutes. Over longer stretches of time, the variance might be greater. The first time I saw Giant erupt, I didn't have a clear idea of when the eruption had officially ended. Other first-time observers may have had similar trouble defining the end of the eruption. However, all of the durations I used for the 2006 calculations were reported by experienced observers. The shortest and longest durations (70 and 104 minutes, respectively) reported last year were obtained by the same observer; I was present at one of these eruptions and was in full agreement on how the end of the eruption was being defined. --Tara Cross fanandmortar at hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Change is good. See what’s different about Windows Live Hotmail. www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/default.html?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_HMWL_reten_changegood_0507 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20070520/7f73dbba/attachment.html>