<html> <head> <style> P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma } </style> </head> <body> > It should be noted that there have been several different ways of measuring > Giant durations. > > The most objective method (I think) is the time from the first continuous > water to the last splash thrown out of the vent. > > Are some of the anomalously short eruptions (D << 90 minutes) due to different > ways of defining the eruption's end? I acknowledged the above problem in my earlier post.  I do believe that there is some variance amongst observers in exactly when the eruption is said to be "over."  I can remember various discussions about this last year as eruptions waned.  Based on these experiences, I would be surprised if the difference was greater than 2-3 minutes.   Over longer stretches of time, the variance might be greater.  The first time I saw Giant erupt, I didn't have a clear idea of when the eruption had officially ended.  Other first-time observers may have had similar trouble defining the end of the eruption.  However, all of the durations I used for the 2006 calculations were reported by experienced observers.  The shortest and longest durations (70 and 104 minutes, respectively) reported last year were obtained by the same observer; I was present at one of these eruptions and was in full agreement on how the end of the eruption was being defined.   --Tara Cross <A href="mailto:fanandmortar@hotmail.com">fanandmortar@hotmail.com</A> <hr />Create the ultimate e-mail address book. Import your contacts to Windows Live Hotmail. <a href='www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/managemail2.html?locale=en-us&ocid=RMT_TAGLM_HMWL_reten_impcont_0507' target='_new'>Try it!</a></body> </html>