I decide to assign a number on something when it both shows signs of "permanency" and/or gets a lot of attention in what might turn out to be a short life. In this case, this geyser has been observed for many years and, although I did not previously give it a number or name, I did mention it in my book (current edition, page 55 where I note [as I have done online] that it was incorrectly identified as Borah Peak Geyser in the early 2000s. It is because of the attention it is generating plus the fact that it is, perhaps, getting larger that I feel it deserves a number along with what appears to be an acceptable name. So yes: UNNG-GHG-14 ("Fandango Geyser"). Will I assign a number to the "thing" near Plume. No, because in my opinion it is simply one more appearance of the feature(s) that in the past included the small geyser known as "Ballcap." T. Scott Bryan In a message dated 3/14/2016 8:17:03 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, mabellingham at gmail.com writes: So, to clarify, "Fandango" will be UNNG-GHG_14, correct? Which bring up a question for Scott - at what point do you assign a number? Obviously a "G" in the UNNG implies it is periodic and acting as a geyser. Will "Thing Near Plume" be next? Udo's report of water to 2 feet is intriguing! Can't wait to go look at these, next month! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20160314/9b6fd5da/attachment.html>