Two responses to Whittlesey's latest embedded below: In a message dated 3/2/2009 6:42:23 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, Lee_Whittlesey at nps.gov writes: Yellowstone and other national parks are---according to the Leopold Report---not supposed to be zoos, ranches, or harvest-gardens. They are not supposed to be commercial. this, of course, being why people not only have to pay to get into the park, but then pay increasingly exorbitant fees to stay at in-park lodgings, buy in-park hamburgers, and such. this liabilitycomes from city parks in England (English Common Law), from which we get much of our own American common law. It means that land owners and occupiers have a well established duty not only to remove hazardous trees in public campgrounds but also to actually INSPECT for such trees and hazards. That's why the trees got removed at Bridge Bay. I could point out a few leaning trees in the lower Old Faithful Inn parking lot. Might not one of those fall? Might is not be removed to eliminate any possible liability? I pray that one lands on my car this summer. Oh, yeah. C'mon people. I speak not just from experience in Yellowstone. In numerous ways, the NPS has gotten ridiculous. Indeed, if this parking lot matter was studied in the Death Valley fashion, it would probably be closed for use pending several years of study. Not a joke -- sorry. Scott Bryan **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20090302/c6ea3d88/attachment.html>