To me, this all sounds like the Volcanologist Full Employment Act of 2005. They think that it must be monitored by staff 24/7 - this means at least four full-time volcanologists monitoring those volcanic hazards like....uh.... what, exactly? Are they going to now monitor geysers? The two threats they cite - small-scale hydrothermal explosions by boardwalks and the pooling of heavy gases during some meteorological conditions in some back-country locales - are not volcanic. And they're nothing new. The question was raised about what effect this might have on access. It's hard to imagine it not having a potential negative effect. Paul Strasser -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 3066 bytes Desc: not available URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20050510/9f82b3b3/attachment.bin>