In a message dated 6/7/2005 6:00:38 PM Mountain Standard Time, seide1 at mindspring.com writes: Scott noted earlier a late Beehive time (VR) in the logbook and discounted it. I'm not sure that's a good idea, but I have no real proof. However, on the fifth after a 0726 (I think, I forgot to write it down) Beehive I was on the hill prior to sunset. The west bubbler was ie at about 2000, I saw the steam from it from over by Old Faithful and went to look at it. Beehive was very wet with many splashes in the next hour and a half, some 2-4 feet over the cone and several feet out from Beehive. On the 6th the log shows a morning eruption of Beehive just after 0800. Seeing Beehive before it was completely dark, I can't believe it waited eleven hours to erupt. I have said several times that we _think_ these are long intervals. The overall behavior is what some call "winter mode" and in that mode Beehive can (positively does) splash in its "normal" fashion starting some 6 to 10 hours after an eruption and continues to do so until the next eruption -- which at times this past winter was at intervals longer than 40 hours... It is therefore very easy to believe that Beehive "waited eleven hours to erupt. Let us also consider that Beehive has certainly _never_ undergone weeks of consistent 10 to 12 hour interval. Is it possible that it is doing so now? Yes, of course. Is it likely? In my opinion, absolutely not. And yes, the electronic monitor (presuming it is working) will hopefully tell the tale. Scott Bryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20050608/f2e1e851/attachment.html>