I suppose the term "flush" now also refers to the faces of the authors of the EA document, as in flush from embarrassment. (c:) Udo Paul Strasser wrote: >Tom Kearney wrote, in response to a query of mine: > ><<The law enforcement rangers at OF have been calling it the "geyser flush" >for at least the 10 summers that I've been working in YNP.>>> > >Oh, I've heard visitors and their actions called even ruder names. I'm just >stunned that this term got through the vetting of the document. > >Have you ever seen the "unofficial visitor center logbook" that was kept >behind the desk in the mid to late 70s and beyond? This is where >naturalists and other NPS people placed their, uh, thoughts about many >things. Sometimes cute, sometimes rather "unkind" of certain >nationalities... > >But the NPS wouldn't put this stuff into a public document. > >Yet they did include the term "geyser flush." > >Clearly, people who spend a lot of time in the park may have some rather >rude terms for some visitors. It's just weird to see the g.f. term in an >official document. There is no way this can be construed as a complimentary >or neutral term, that's all. > >I'm just as guilty as the next person of thinking rude terms to describe >some visitors (and their actions). But I wouldn't use them in public - even >here. The thing is - the OFVEC EA is an incredibly public document. > >Paul Strasser > > > >_______________________________________________ >Geysers mailing list >Geysers at wwc.edu >https://mailman.wwc.edu/mailman/listinfo/geysers > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20050130/0b75186b/attachment.html>