<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16457"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>If you aren't "100% sure" that an eruption happened, then it most decidedly should not EVER be entered as "assumed," and absolutely, positively never ever should be entered with any sort of time.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>By contrast, knowing that an eruption did definitely take place without knowing exactly when should be indicated as such but never with any sort of time designation.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 1/1/2013 5:21:36 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, wolveslax65@comcast.net writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=3 face=Calibri> <DIV>By adding “AE” or “A” to a time this would make it clear that the entry means that you know it erupted but you don’t have the exact time instead of that it may have been in eruption at 0000 from an actual</DIV> <DIV>observation at that exact time. Also a time of 0000A? would resemble that you weren’t 100% sure that your assumed eruption happened.</DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>