<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16450"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>I'll make one short comment here -- if it isn't anything that I can actually see within my human experience, the nit is not "real." Adjust or modify or alter or whatever you want, but if it alters reality in any way, then it is "unreal." Period.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>P.S. The Curmudgeon says this sort of thing has no business going on-and-on on this list.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 10/22/2012 5:07:03 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, Lee_Whittlesey@nps.gov writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>The image is fanciful, created, unreal, "enhanced," photo-shopped, messed with, or (using the most simple term) faked. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>