<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16440"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>As I pointed out yesterday, this activity by North Goggles Geyser is (mostly) different from the series seen in 1985 and 1993, and to my knowledge it is/was far more intense (that is, many more eruptions). "N G Mode 3"?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Also, in the past, both eruptions and steam phases have been observed in Goggles Spring at the time of North Goggles Geyser <U>major</U> eruptions. I do not recall if they were ever seen at the times of North Goggles so-called intermediate eruptions, which I believe these "195 second" eruptions qualify as. True majors had durations of 2 1/2 minutes and longer (usually much longer) and were concluded by powerful steam phases.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV>----------------------</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 2/13/2012 11:18:04 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, dmonteit@comcast.net writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>No eruption of North Goggles was seen after the 1536 eruption.  I double<BR>checked this on the recordings.  <BR><BR>Does anyone know if the behavior we've seen the past two days has been<BR>seen before?<BR><BR>Janet White reminded me of something I forgot to mention in yesterday's<BR>report.  Puffing steam was seen from Goggle Spring after both 195 second<BR>duration eruptions of North Goggles but no water was visible on the<BR>webcam.  Of course water from a normal eruption of Goggle Spring is<BR>unlikely to be seen on the webcam.<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>