<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16440"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>I can do no better than second everything David said. No, I do not feel that those vents qualify as separate geysers.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 2/11/2012 7:49:17 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, david.schwarz@alumni.duke.edu writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> As for whether they're separate geysers...  I'd say no, not any more that the cone sputterers on Daisy are separate geysers.  When Spiteful is full, the sput is in eruption--from whichever vent is dominant.  When Spiteful drains after an eruption, the sput quits.  It's a high-water-level vent of Spiteful that functions as a perpetual spouter when active.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>