<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16722"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>Perhaps we'll hear something from NZ gazers, but... Christchurch is about halfway down the south island, while the geyser areas are in the middle of the north island. That's a long distance, so I doubt if there's been any changes of note.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 2/24/2011 7:26:15 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, caros@xmission.com writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Hoping this doesn't sound inappropriately callous, but are our friends  <BR>like Ron Keam down under doing OK? And (this was the really callous  <BR>question), has this second big quake nuked the thermal features? Or  <BR>might we see Waimangu sort out its plumbing system and erupt again?  <BR>Hearing from lots of people (fortunately, most are OK) but was hoping  <BR>the lack of info on the NZ thermal features doesn't mean our geyser  <BR>friends (carbon and silicon-based) have been harmed.<BR>Karen Webb<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Geysers mailing list<BR>Geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu<BR>https://lists.wallawalla.edu/mailman/listinfo/geysers<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>