<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18939"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>Depending on your "definition" of "high flow volume"... back in 1986, when Fantail was actively discharging rather great volumes of water, we looked for and could see absolutely no change in activity or discharge by such nearby (yes, across the river, but very near) features as Hillside and Seismic, nor in the nearby springs on the Fantail side of the river. I'm sure there are other examples.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 9/28/2010 5:02:14 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, brdavis@iusb.edu writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Tahoma>Second, are there other examples of such high flow volume features with such significantly different hydrostatic levels located this close to each other (and what is that due to - very different hydraulic conductivities, i.e., one has significantly greater hydraulic "friction" than the other)? </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>