<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18928"></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial> <DIV>As with Graham, I write from afar, and the following should not be taken as a prediction. However (hoo-ha), in 1994 in the five days prior to Beehive's Indicator beginning a stretch of 10 days without triggering Beehive, the pattern was:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Beehive (1044 on 6/28/1994), False, Beehive, False, Beehive, Mid-cycle, Beehive, gap in data, Beehive, Mid-cycle, False, Beehive (at 0057 on 7/2/1994), Mid-cycle, Mid-cycle, and  False (0908 on 7/2/1994). The next eruption of Beehive was recorded at 1647 on 7/12.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>We do not know it for absolutely certain, but it is reasonably sure that there were no Beehives during those 10 days, HOWEVER, there was a Dome (initial at 1636 on 7/5/1994) and a Giantess (initial 0925 on 7/11/1994).</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>So I wish I was in the Park, but.....</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Scott Bryan</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 8/7/2010 8:00:00 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, meechg@verizon.net writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=3 face=Arial> <DIV>There several false indicators reported today but then there was one for real this afternoon so reports of Beehive's demise have been greatly exagerated.  I also claim no power to influence Beehive's ability to erupt from ~1700 miles away although it current activity is exciting don't you think?</DIV> <DIV>Beehive 1334ie Indicator 1318ie, </DIV> <DIV>Behive Indicator (no Beehive) 0808ie d~59min , 1834ie, 2018ie, </DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>