<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<STYLE>.hmmessage P {
        PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY.hmmessage {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.5726" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=hmmessage bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>May I suggest a page on the GOSA site with what happens to
geysers when drilling occurs? This should be one of the first pages students and
reporters get when they research geothermal energy. I volunteer myself to
write it if needed (I am sure others would be better for this). Lets do
that as a first step. GOSA directors what say you?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I'm all in favor of establishing contacts and preparing
for quick action if action is needed. How does one do this? Maybe
Bill or John can help with this angle.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Jan Johns</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=johnwarnock@msn.com href="mailto:johnwarnock@msn.com">JOHN
WARNOCK</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu
href="mailto:geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu">geyser observation reports</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:02
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Geysers] Yellowstone
Science article</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I think Udo makes a great observation regarding geothermal
being viewed as a "green energy" source. I remember in the late 1980's
or early 90's, a private company was looking to lease land in the Island
Park geothermal areas in order to explore the potential to generate
electricity from the thermal waters. This happened shortly
after brother Bill and I (with the help of many of you) had finished
our encounter with the NPS regarding removal of all the cabins in the Old
Faithful area, among other issues. We had established a solid core of
contacts in Washington DC , including Senators and House
Representatives, and within the Park Service it self. I was
amazed at how quickly the word went out that Old Faithful and the other
geothermal wonders of Yellowstone were under assault from energy
development. As I recall, wells were being proposed within 12 miles of
the Upper Geyser Basin. The leases were not granted. If a new
assault may be coming, I can think of no higher cause for GOSA than to begin
organizing now, making contacts in Congress, NPS, USGS and the
press. That way if new assaults begin, we can immediately mobilize
and hopefully cut them off at the pass. Speaking from experience,
Brother Bill and I can testify that persistence can pay
off.<BR> <BR>Respectfully;<BR> <BR>John
Warnock <BR> <BR> <BR> Mon, 27
Apr 2009 07:11:05 -0700<BR>From: udo.freund@lmco.com<BR>Subject: RE: [Geysers]
Yellowstone Science article<BR>To: geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff>Here's Tami Blackford, the editor's,
response to my mentioning the reversal of that image to her:
"</FONT><SPAN lang=EN><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff>Yes, that
image was transposed. Thanks for noticing!<SPAN
class=EC_784451513-27042009>" Sad that those who live in Mammoth don't
notice these things beforehand. Either they don't know better or
don't look at details carefully, both are poor excuses when portraying
science. But we humans do make misteaks
(sic).</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=EC_784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009>As
for the content of the article, I too found it greatly
under-researched. If I recall correctly it is a condensed version
of a master's thesis, probably written some time before being reproduced in
YS.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=EC_784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009>But
at least this type of info is getting published, hopefully leading to more
media attention on the subject. Which brings up a point. Media are
portraying geothermal as a green energy source with seemingly little
adverse impacts. The Obama administration is pushing this agenda
and they are essentially the boss of those who might object, namely NPS and
USGS. I'm sure most of you are aware that using
geothermal aquifers kills geyser activity. That proven fact should be
brought to the media's attention whenever the subject comes up. In the
USA we've already lost geysers at Steamboat and Beowawe in Nevada
and Mammoth in California. In my opinion, since few others will
advocate for this cause, GOSA and its' associates should take
up the task. In other words, I believe that it's time for GOSA to become
politically active rather than being a passive hobby
club.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=EC_784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=EC_784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=EC_784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN
lang=en-us><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#007600>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face="Script MT Bold" color=#007600 size=4><SPAN
lang=en-us><FONT face="Script MT Bold" color=#007600 size=4>Udo</FONT></SPAN>
Freund</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=en-us><I><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#ff0000 size=1>Blessed are those that run around in circles for they
shall be called big wheels!</FONT></I></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><EM><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
face="Comic Sans MS" color=#ff0000 size=1></FONT></EM><BR>
<DIV class=EC_OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> geysers-bounces@lists.wallawalla.edu
[mailto:geysers-bounces@lists.wallawalla.edu] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>TSBryan@aol.com<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, April 25, 2009 12:54
PM<BR><B>To:</B> geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Geysers]
Yellowstone Science article<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><FONT id=EC_role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>The Curmudgeon here, at least for item #1... this e-mail will also
respond to some off-list stuff, on which I've been a bit delayed because of my
step-daughter's surgery for a badly herniated disk. (She's much better today,
thank you.)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. The first 2009 issue of "Yellowstone Science" contains a nice article
by Alethea Steingisser and W. Andrew Marcus, titled "Human Impacts on Geyser
Basins" (<A
href="http://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/upload/ys17(1)p1.pdf">www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/upload/ys17(1)p1.pdf</A>
and click on the top (part 1) link -- the article starts on page 7). Good
enough (except for a couple of minor comments below)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>BUT... how about that title photograph. If I was the authors I'd be
severely disappointed; if I was anybody with the NPS who has anything to do
with Yellowstone Science, I'd be really (really) upset. If you haven't seen
it, here's a scan of that image (small jpg, embedded and attached)<IMG
id=EC_MA1.1240689235 style="WIDTH: 480px; HEIGHT: 263px" height=263
src="cid:48EEDF0FF44F4B16B45C9ABE481CA310@Grotto" width=480 vspace=5></DIV>
<DIV>I trust you see what is wrong. The scene might look better if you hold
the picture to a mirror.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sorry, folks, but that's bad.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2. In Table 1 of the article, several places are noted with asterisks
("No data available"). This is, I guess conservatism by the authors, but I
must say that since there has been zero geothermal development (other than use
of natural runoff) in Kamchatka's Valley of Geysers, then the asterisk in the
table's first column should be replaced with "No." Same for Umnak. Also, in
this table, there most definitely was a negative effect of tourism on the
geysers and springs at Steamboat Hot Springs (that, by the way, being the
proper name for the place). There were what amount to tourism activities there
at least as early as the 1860s plus there was the resort (I don't recall
its date offhand), and there were some substantial alterations to the valley
springs at Beowawe. I could make note of some other asterisks but won't.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3. Here comes a point at which it is unfortunate that the annotated
bibliography, that appeared in editions 1, 2, and 3 of my book had to be
deleted from edition 4 (where the discussion about places around the world was
significantly reduced, too) due to cost constraints. Anyhow, regarding the
note on page 17 of the article, I wish it stated something a bit stronger --
not just records, but written records. I possess numerous reports, often
including maps, that were never actually published -- I recall significant
trials in obtaining several unpublished reports from the National Library in
Australia. Anyhow, if it is in my book, it can be documented.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4. I know there are always delays from manuscript to print, but still --
the 4th Edition of my book did come out around August 1, 2008, several months
prior to this publication, so I find it too bad that it did not find its way
into the "Literature Cited." I think some slightly-different numbers might be
found there.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>T. Scott Bryan</DIV></FONT><BR><FONT
style="FONT: 10pt arial,san-serif; COLOR: black">
<HR>
Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. <A
href="http://toolbar.aol.com/mail/download.html?ncid=txtlnkusdown00000027">Try
the new Email Toolbar now</A>!</FONT>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>Geysers mailing
list<BR>Geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu<BR>https://lists.wallawalla.edu/mailman/listinfo/geysers</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>