<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff>Here's Tami Blackford, the editor's, response
to my mentioning the reversal of that image to her: "</FONT><SPAN
lang=EN><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff>Yes, that image was
transposed. Thanks for noticing!<SPAN class=784451513-27042009>" Sad that
those who live in Mammoth don't notice these things beforehand. Either
they don't know better or don't look at details carefully, both
are poor excuses when portraying science. But we humans do make
misteaks (sic).</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=784451513-27042009>As for
the content of the article, I too found it greatly under-researched.
If I recall correctly it is a condensed version of a master's thesis,
probably written some time before being reproduced in
YS.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=784451513-27042009>But at
least this type of info is getting published, hopefully leading to more media
attention on the subject. Which brings up a point. Media are
portraying geothermal as a green energy source with seemingly little
adverse impacts. The Obama administration is pushing this agenda and
they are essentially the boss of those who might object, namely NPS and
USGS. <!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->I'm sure most of
you are aware that using geothermal aquifers kills geyser
activity. That proven fact should be brought to the media's attention
whenever the subject comes up. In the USA we've already lost geysers at
Steamboat and Beowawe in Nevada and Mammoth in California. In my
opinion, since few others will advocate for this cause, GOSA and its'
associates should take up the task. In other words, I believe that
it's time for GOSA to become politically active rather than being a passive
hobby club.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=784451513-27042009><SPAN lang=EN><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN
class=784451513-27042009></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN
lang=en-us><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#007600>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face="Script MT Bold" color=#007600 size=4>Udo
Freund</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=en-us><I><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#ff0000 size=1>Blessed are those that run around in circles for they shall
be called big wheels!</FONT></I></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><EM><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
face="Comic Sans MS" color=#ff0000 size=1></FONT></EM><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> geysers-bounces@lists.wallawalla.edu
[mailto:geysers-bounces@lists.wallawalla.edu] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>TSBryan@aol.com<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, April 25, 2009 12:54
PM<BR><B>To:</B> geysers@lists.wallawalla.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Geysers]
Yellowstone Science article<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>The Curmudgeon here, at least for item #1... this e-mail will also respond
to some off-list stuff, on which I've been a bit delayed because of my
step-daughter's surgery for a badly herniated disk. (She's much better today,
thank you.)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. The first 2009 issue of "Yellowstone Science" contains a nice article by
Alethea Steingisser and W. Andrew Marcus, titled "Human Impacts on Geyser
Basins" (<A
href="http://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/upload/ys17(1)p1.pdf">www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/upload/ys17(1)p1.pdf</A>
and click on the top (part 1) link -- the article starts on page 7). Good enough
(except for a couple of minor comments below)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>BUT... how about that title photograph. If I was the authors I'd be
severely disappointed; if I was anybody with the NPS who has anything to do with
Yellowstone Science, I'd be really (really) upset. If you haven't seen it,
here's a scan of that image (small jpg, embedded and attached)<IMG
id=MA1.1240689235 style="WIDTH: 480px; HEIGHT: 263px" height=263
src="cid:784451513@27042009-038D" width=480 vspace=5 DATASIZE="36218"
comp_state="speed"></DIV>
<DIV>I trust you see what is wrong. The scene might look better if you hold the
picture to a mirror.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sorry, folks, but that's bad.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2. In Table 1 of the article, several places are noted with asterisks ("No
data available"). This is, I guess conservatism by the authors, but I must say
that since there has been zero geothermal development (other than use of natural
runoff) in Kamchatka's Valley of Geysers, then the asterisk in the table's first
column should be replaced with "No." Same for Umnak. Also, in this table, there
most definitely was a negative effect of tourism on the geysers and springs at
Steamboat Hot Springs (that, by the way, being the proper name for the place).
There were what amount to tourism activities there at least as early as the
1860s plus there was the resort (I don't recall its date offhand), and there
were some substantial alterations to the valley springs at Beowawe. I could make
note of some other asterisks but won't.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3. Here comes a point at which it is unfortunate that the annotated
bibliography, that appeared in editions 1, 2, and 3 of my book had to be deleted
from edition 4 (where the discussion about places around the world was
significantly reduced, too) due to cost constraints. Anyhow, regarding the note
on page 17 of the article, I wish it stated something a bit stronger -- not just
records, but written records. I possess numerous reports, often including maps,
that were never actually published -- I recall significant trials in obtaining
several unpublished reports from the National Library in Australia. Anyhow, if
it is in my book, it can be documented.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4. I know there are always delays from manuscript to print, but still --
the 4th Edition of my book did come out around August 1, 2008, several months
prior to this publication, so I find it too bad that it did not find its way
into the "Literature Cited." I think some slightly-different numbers might be
found there.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>T. Scott Bryan</DIV></FONT><BR><FONT
style="FONT: 10pt arial,san-serif; COLOR: black">
<HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">
Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. <A
href="http://toolbar.aol.com/mail/download.html?ncid=txtlnkusdown00000027">Try
the new Email Toolbar now</A>!</FONT>
<DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>