<html><body> <DIV>Lucille:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Can you pass along the responses to yor bear question.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Kevn Brown</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- > Send Geysers mailing list submissions to > geysers@wwc.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.wwc.edu/mailman/listinfo/geysers > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > geysers-request@wwc.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > geysers-owner@wwc.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Geysers digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. motels in West Yellowstone (Rosalie Schack) > 2. Geyser report June 5 (TSBryan@aol.com) > 3. Re: Geyser Report: Giant/Grotto, May 26-June 1 (Steve Robinson) > 4. RE: Phot: Bear on UGB May 30, 2005 (Lucille Reilly) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:51:57 +0000 > From: "Rosalie Schack" <SCHACK@HOTMAIL.COM> > Subject: [Geysers] motels in West Yellowstone > To: geysers@wwc.edu > Message-ID: <BAY17-F404444899083D103DC1B2CDEFB0@PHX.GBL> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > > Can someone please tell me some inexpensive motels in West Yellowstone? I > know you have discussed this in the past, but I don't remember which motels > they were. This would be for about the third week in July. As long as the > bed is comfortable, and the bathroom is clean, that's about all we need. > > Thanks, > Rosalie in Minnesota > > > > - - - - - - - - - - > "Those who dream by day are cognizant of many things which escape those who > only dream by night." ---E dgar Allan Poe > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:18:17 EDT > From: TSBryan@aol.com > Subject: [Geysers] Geyser report June 5 > To: geysers@wwc.edu > Message-ID: <FE.14EC2389.2FD51A79@AOL.COM> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > A short report today -- quite a few geysers seen but only a couple of > intervals of mention -- lots of good conversations, though, so it was fun. > > Beehive interval 20h 42m > Aurum interval 3h 05m > Grand interval overnight 8h 04m > Oblong interval 3h 49m > Daisy interval 2h 42m > > Plume remained dormant. > > > Dwarf was not seen on 0830 arrival, but it was strongly active at 1300. > > Since Castle was at 12:xx yesterday afternoon, then 0512 this morning, it > clearly had a minor in the vicinity of 0100. > > Grotto Fountain, at 1116, was one of the weakest I've ever seen. The Giant > Hot Period a short while before, although lasting around 8 minutes, was also > very weak. > > Pink Cone is running very close to 20 hours average interval. > > Scott Bryan > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://mailman.wwc.edu/mailman/private/geysers/attachments/20050605/75ad13a2/at > tachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:46:34 -0700 > From: Steve Robinson <GEYSIRS@COMCAST.NET> > Subject: Re: [Geysers] Geyser Report: Giant/Grotto, May 26-June 1 > To: geyser observation reports <GEYSERS@WWC.EDU> > Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.0.20050603195252.02570ab8@mail.comcast.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > I have a little to add to this. On Tuesday morning when I went down to > Giant. Bijou was on strong, but no apparent hot period had occurred. I had > observed Bijou from 0530 till the hot period at 0811. Instead of Bijou > weakening after a hot period until it was hard to tell if it was on, in a > slowdown or a shutdown as was typical for my prior 10 days observation, > opening weekend and closing weekend last fall, Bijou was on fairly strong > right up to the hot period at 0811 with regular slowdown and shutdowns. > Something in the Giant complex has changed in my opinion. I am not saying > that this is good, bad or indifferent, just a change. > > The recovery hot period on June 1st was at: > 2024 d=4:02 Mastiff surge to just 1 foot in the first minute of the hot > period. India was safe. > > June 2nd > 0617 Grotto Fountain > 0620 Grotto > 0648 Giant hot period, d=2:50 Feather and the SW vents were the only vent > involved. Mastiff only overflowed a little, India was safe again > > Steve Robinson > > > > At 03:20 AM 6/3/2005, you wrote: > > > >A message from Tara Cross <FANANDMORTAR@HOTMAIL.COM>6/3/05 > > > >This is a summary of events in the Giant/Grotto area for May 26-June 1. > >This is all based on notes and my memory; if I left something important > >out, I would welcome additional information. > > > >May 26 > > > >0631ie Grotto (marathon, duration around 22 hours, give or take) > >0742ie Rocket major > > > >May 27 > > > >0910 Giant hot period, d=10m20s. First after marathon; Mastiff surging to > >4 feet, India completely covered. > >1510 G iant hot period, d=6m. Mastiff surging to 1-2 feet. > >1625ie Grotto Fountain > >1636 Grotto > > > >The first Grotto after the marathon was--yes--another marathon, duration > >unknown. Grotto was still erupting when Kitt left Grand around 2230, but > >was long done when the first gazers made it out the following morning. > > > >May 28 > > > >0701 Giant hot period, d=2m50s. Probably not the post-marathon hot period. > >0926 Giant hot period, d=3m50s. Feather & Feather Satellite, but no > >Southwest Vents. > >1240 Giant hot period, d=9m30s. Nice Mastiff surging to 4 feet, India > >completely covered. > >1639 Grotto > >1650 Giant hot period, d=7m50s. Mastiff boiling to 1 foot, India 2/3 covered. > >2014 Giant hot period, d=8m56s. Mastiff to 18 inches, India 2/3 covered. > > > >May 29 > > > >0704 Giant hot period, d=7m40s. More droolage. > >1040 Giant hot period, d=7m25s. Even more droolage; Mastiff barely boiled > >at all and India was dry. > > > >I somehow missed writing down the Grotto that was in progress for these > >two hot periods, but it also turned out to be yet another marathon, after > >only two normal Grotto eruptions. > > > >May 30 > > > >1202 Giant hot period, d=10m15s. This hot period was the real deal. > >Mastiff surged to 4-5 feet in the first few minutes and then to 2-3 feet > >later on. At the end of the hot period and continuing after Feather had > >stopped, Turtle splashed to 1-2 feet. > >1732ie Giant hot period, d>5m. Mastiff surging to 1-2 feet. > >1845 Grotto Fountain > >1859 Grotto > >2045 Giant hot period, d=8m50s. Mastiff to 2 feet maximum. > > > >May 31 > > > >0811 Giant hot period, d=8m55s. India was about 2/3 covered, but Mastiff > >never boiled to more than a few inches. > >0849 Grotto Fountain > >0852 Grotto > >0951 Bathtub. The Southwest Vents sputtered but Feather did not start. > >1250 Giant hot period, d=8m58s. Mastiff surging to 4 feet early in the > >hot period, then 2-3 feet later on. India was completely covered. > > > >When we left the area, Grotto Fountain was boiling. I never heard a start > >time on Grotto but it was i.e. when I returned from the Lower basin a > >little before 1500. And, as if I hadn't gotten enough Grotto over the > >weekend, this was another marathon. > > > >1709 Giant hot period, d=8m04s. Mastiff to 3 feet, India 3/4 covered. > > > >June 1 > > > >Grotto finally quit aro und 1230 for a duration of roughly 23 hours. I > >left the basin before the post-marathon hot period. > > > >My general observations are that while there were bona fide "strong" hot > >periods mixed in, the longer durations seen on the 28th and after weren't > >really indicative of more energy on the platform. Note the total lack of > >durations under 5 minutes after the 28th. It was almost as if Giant > >wanted to have one long hot period that expended roughly the same amount > >of energy as two weak ones. "Mastiff is flat but still overflowing" > >became a very common call for the latter part of the weekend--at least > >when Grotto WASN'T in marathon. Based on some rough extrapolations, there > >were zero, 2, and 2 Grotto eruptions, respectively, between the 4 > >marathons I saw. As encouraging as the recovery hot periods were, this > >still doe sn't strike me as a good formula for Giant eruptions. > > > >I shall refrain from further prognostication. > > > >- Tara Cross > >fanandmortar@hotmail.com > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Geysers mailing list > >Geysers@wwc.edu > >https://mailman.wwc.edu/mailman/listinfo/geysers > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 267.5.1 - Release Date: 6/2/2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 267 - Release Date: 6/2/2005 > > > > > ------------------------------ > > M essage: 4 > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:34:02 -0600 > From: Lucille Reilly <THEDULCIMERLADY@JUNO.COM> > Subject: [Geysers] RE: Phot: Bear on UGB May 30, 2005 > To: geysers@wwc.edu > Message-ID: <20050605.213430.-413905.8.TheDulcimerLady@juno.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Thanks for all the responses. Much appreciated! > > Back to packing suitcases. > > Lucille > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geysers mailing list > Geysers@wwc.edu > https://mailman.wwc.edu/mailman/listinfo/geysers > > > End of Geysers Digest, Vol 213, Issue 1 > *************************************** </BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>