[Geysers] New feature by Plume
TSBryan at aol.com
TSBryan at aol.com
Thu Mar 17 07:30:29 PDT 2016
I'm glad Mara corrected herself on that business of number features like
Sputnik and Tilt's Baby. Clearly, Tilt's Baby is Tilt coming out of a new
hole, and that is how it is described; it does not deserve a separate number
or description. The Sputniks probably represent energy/water that once upon
a time years ago found egress through North Triplet, but they also show a
relationship to Rift, and in any case, are removed from these other features
by quite a few feet, distances great enough to merit a separate
description.
So, as for that thing near Plume, how about using GHG-2, at least for the
time being. The reason I dislike putting a name or other designation on it
is that I'll be surprised if it becomes a "permanent" feature. Here is my
draft write-up for a new edition of my book (which I think-hope will happed
during 2017:
15. UNNG-GHG-2 was a ragged hole a few feet to the left of Plume Geyser
(14). During some seasons in past years, eruptions were frequent and up to 2
feet high, but erosion and sedimentation obliterated the crater. The
informal name once given (“Ballcap Geyser”) probably should not be used, since
both the green hat within the crater and the spring's vent have
disappeared. That geyser was replaced in the early 2000s by another small geyser in
the same area. It also disappeared after a brief existence, and now the site
bears several flowing vents, any of which can unpredictably undergo small
eruptions. Developments in 2015 into 2016 produced a feature that played up
to 2 feet high.
Scott Bryan
-----------------------------
In a message dated 3/16/2016 3:39:21 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
mara.reed at me.com writes:
If I remember correctly (don’t have my book on me), you assigned numbers
to “Sputnik” and “Tilt’s Baby,” despite them being fairly clear expressions
of a previous geyser’s energy. I would agree that holding off on assigning
official designations is important, but can we perhaps discuss a common
usage name since it is a feature that is getting attention from gazers?
Always writing out the phrase “new thing near Plume” seems unnecessary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20160317/32854884/attachment.html>
More information about the Geysers
mailing list