[Geysers] Data Collection
Peggy Treat
artista.treat at gmail.com
Tue Dec 27 08:20:18 PST 2011
I agree! personally I am ever so grateful for all the data collected by
gazers and all the knowledge you have all shared with me ( a wanna be).
Because of many generous gazers I have met while waiting, I have caught the
love of geysers! I also have become quite lucky at catching them :) Thanks
so much for sharing the joy!
Peggy Treat
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stephen Eide <stepheneide at cableone.net>wrote:
> Greetings and Salutations,
>
> I too have enjoyed the discussion on gathering geyser stats. But several
> people have said something I feel I must disagree with. They said some
> variation on "collecting data on geyser activity probably not important
> or has no use in the long run". Science lives and dies on proper data
> collection. And science has many instances where old "useless" data is
> later found to be very useful and even essential. Of course, it also may
> turn out to have very little benefit in the future, but no one knows one
> way or the other. I believe it is important to collect the data as
> accurately as possible because I do not know when, where, or how it may be
> useful in the future (or present) but there is always the chance it will
> be. But it can only be useful if it is collected and recorded. I am quite
> sure when the first bacteria were pulled out of Mushroom Pool no one had
> any idea the effect it would have on genetic research. All data is
> essential for the progress of science.
>
> Which brings me to the other reason why the data should be recorded. For
> the same reasons we record all of history. Ten years from now I (and I am
> sure others) be interested in what the activity was in 2010 at Fan and
> Mortar, Grotto, Jet, Bead, or what ever geyser you can name A hundred
> years from now will there be people who would want to know about the
> eruptions of Fan and Mortar in 2010? I hope so, I do believe geyser geeks
> will live on. And I think the same will be true a thousand years from
> now. Beyond the realm of science the data would be important to record if
> just for the historical information it contains. Historians always moan
> about the huge amounts of information that has been lost forever because no
> one thought it was important to record at the time it was happening. If
> you spend much time looking into the history of a geyser or thermal area I
> think you will be amazed by how little of the "commonly known" data was
> recorded for posterity. If I am dismayed by that loss of past data, then I
> must have a duty to help record and preserve the current data.
>
> Of course, this is just my personal credo.
>
> Stephen Eide
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geysers mailing list
> Geysers at lists.wallawalla.edu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20111227/0d90dd75/attachment.html>
More information about the Geysers
mailing list