This article is an example of astoundingly poor journalism. It didn't even address whether the "proposal" would even work. Obviously, I'm against this for about a million reasons, but the first question an unbiased journalist should have asked is "Could this work?" and then "Where can I find an actual scientist to address whether it might work?" before even addressing the question of whether it would be a popular idea. I was editor of my lowly college newspaper, and this article wouldn't have gotten past me on that basis alone. Becky **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20081206/cff5e13b/attachment.html>