In a message dated 2/8/2005 17:43:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, upperbasin at comcast.net writes: It looks a little like 42W (not 24W), but I don’t recall the vegetation-covered area immediately behind it. I immediately thought of 42w but then, primarily because of the vegetation on the slope behing, felt that that slope is much too close to the geyser -- can't be 42w. (My opinion, which probably doesan't matter anymore, anyhow.) Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </geyser-list/attachments/20050208/890cc372/attachment.html>